Brief · South Dakota · 2026-10-19

Water infrastructure intelligence — South Dakota

2026-10-19 · Clean Water SRF, Drinking Water SRF · $3.2M in tracked project value · list grew 81 → 82 (FFY2026)

The October 2026 South Dakota brief covers FFY2026 Clean Water SRF (Funding List/PPL) and FFY2026 Drinking Water SRF (Funding List/PPL), adopted September 2026. 2 entered the fundable range — the closest signal to imminent procurement. The combined priority list grew from 81 to 82 projects.

Advanced to funding
2
New listings
0

Top developments

Advanced to funding
Aberdeen

Problem: the city's existing water storage capacity is not able to meet average day demands. Project: construct a 1.5-million-gallon water storage tower and install approximately 15,000 feet of transmission mains to connect the tower to the distribution system.. Requested $2.5M.

DWSRF · Brown
Advanced to funding
Elk Point

Problem: The city of Elk Point’s existing wells and storage tanks do not have sufficient capacity to meet their peak day usage needs. The raw water from the wells has water quality issues related to hardness, iron, and manganese. The city’s existing treatment plant is at the end of its useful life and not able to be expanded for additional capacity. Project: The city would like to pursue connection to the Clay Rural Water System for bulk water supply and construct a new water storage tower to meet peak day demands. The connection portion of the project from Clay RWS to Elk Point for a new water source is eligible for emerging contaminants funding due to manganese issues.. Requested $730K.

DWSRF · Union

Aberdeen advanced to the funding list (Problem: the city's existing water storage capacity is not able to meet average ), requested $2.5M.

Elk Point advanced to the funding list (Problem: The city of Elk Point’s existing wells and storage tanks do not have su), requested $730K.

Collection & sewer is the largest category by tracked value, at 30 projects worth $221.7M. Water treatment follows at 22 projects worth $216.3M.

The list grew from 81 to 82 projects, tracking $3.2M in all.

Advanced to funding

2

Projects the state has flagged as fundable — the closest signal to imminent procurement. Ordered by requested amount.

Aberdeen$2.5MProblem: the city's existing water storage capacity is not able to meet average day demands. Project: construct a 1.5-million-gallon water storage tower and install approximately 15,000 feet of transmission mains to connect the tower to the distribution system. · DWSRF
Elk Point$730KProblem: The city of Elk Point’s existing wells and storage tanks do not have sufficient capacity to meet their peak day usage needs. The raw water from the wells has water quality issues related to hardness, iron, and manganese. The city’s existing treatment plant is at the end of its useful life and not able to be expanded for additional capacity. Project: The city would like to pursue connection to the Clay Rural Water System for bulk water supply and construct a new water storage tower to meet peak day demands. The connection portion of the project from Clay RWS to Elk Point for a new water source is eligible for emerging contaminants funding due to manganese issues. · DWSRF

Rising in priority

Projects that climbed materially in priority (rank, or priority score where a state scores projects) since the previous list — the least-watched signal in the document.

County heat — South Dakota

Lawrence County — $2.4MMinnehaha County — $20.4MTurner County — $15.7MAurora County — $0Lake County — $0Hyde County — $0Bennett County — $0Buffalo County — $0Miner County — $5.5MClark County — $0Gregory County — $7.1MDouglas County — $0Marshall County — $0Codington County — $0Hutchinson County — $0Butte County — $16.9MHand County — $0Kingsbury County — $0Davison County — $119.0MLyman County — $0Edmunds County — $19.7MFall River County — $52.8MPotter County — $0Sanborn County — $0Todd County — $0Perkins County — $9.4MHughes County — $0Custer County — $6.6MBrule County — $4.4MPennington County — $54.6MSpink County — $0Union County — $26.6MBon Homme County — $5.5MClay County — $6.8MGrant County — $92.3MDewey County — $0Yankton County — $1.9MJackson County — $0Lincoln County — $16.3MMeade County — $0Walworth County — $0Jones County — $0Harding County — $0Corson County — $0Tripp County — $0Jerauld County — $0Moody County — $0Sully County — $0Faulk County — $668KMcCook County — $35.3MMellette County — $0Roberts County — $1.7MOglala Lakota County — $0Stanley County — $0Ziebach County — $0Campbell County — $0Brookings County — $22.8MHaakon County — $0Beadle County — $3.6MHanson County — $0Hamlin County — $9.8MDay County — $1.8MMcPherson County — $0Charles Mix County — $0Brown County — $48.7MDeuel County — $10.9M
$0$400.0M+

Project types this snapshot

Collection & sewer30
Water treatment22
Lift / pump stations15
Wastewater treatment15
Watermain & distribution27
Wells & source13
Coverage note

Projects seeking SRF financing — not every municipal water or wastewater project in South Dakota. Source: South Dakota Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources — Clean Water SRF, Drinking Water SRF (IUP/PPL). Stages are labeled precisely; "no longer listed" does not assert an outcome.

Sources: MN Public Facilities Authority IUP/PPL · WI DNR CWFP & SDWLP · ND DEQ DWSRF/CWSRF IUP · IL EPA PWSLP & WPCLP IUP · IA DNR/IFA DWSRF & CWSRF PPL · SD DANR DWSRF & CWSRF IUP · MI EGLE DWSRF & CWSRF IUP · 3M settlement award announcements. Snapshots diffed weekly.MethodBriefsPricingTerms & privacyContact